{"id":2127,"date":"2025-11-06T15:16:13","date_gmt":"2025-11-06T18:16:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/?p=2127"},"modified":"2025-11-06T22:11:14","modified_gmt":"2025-11-07T01:11:14","slug":"cop30","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/?p=2127","title":{"rendered":"COP30"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Murilo Jambeiro de Oliveira<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brazil, November 6, 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Climate Conference in the Brazilian Amazon, called the Action Conference, has an important bias. Currently, the resources spent globally on the Kyoto Protocol are not a source of great happiness; they actually serve the purpose of continuing carbon emissions. They have an eminently punitive role, making them vast resources to continue emitting carbon into the atmosphere through an appropriate punitive mechanism, since the consequences are global. What is the issue? For example, Brazil has immense carbon sinks, or absorption masses. And the Brazilian Amazon, like the entire country, faces a great challenge: to make it economically advantageous to keep the forest standing, fulfilling this role of carbon absorption masses, as more dignified and potentially richer through these punitive mechanisms that arise with the Kyoto Protocol. Let it be stated once again, in the global calculation, it is not a solution, but a mitigation measure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But let’s get to the facts: it’s a basic sanitation problem in every aspect that this encompasses in Brazil. It’s not simply a matter of ensuring that a “Water Producer” invests in riparian forests; there’s a need for governmental coordination in the distribution of such resources. What we hear most often in Brazil, and it’s quite eloquent here, is that it’s necessary to make it worthwhile to keep the forest standing. And this means generating economic activity, financial flow, for a given population, which simply excludes deforestation and transfers economic cycles to the people who live in the forest, to those who are at least minimally non-aggressive towards it, keeping the forest standing. And it shouldn’t be limited to that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For many years, one of the great discourses lacking action was when the tropical forest was left unexploited and its biodiversity was not understood. Before becoming a defining factor for urgent action, it was an ideological restraint regarding the fact that the standing forest doesn’t simply need to be profitable for those who live there \u2013 this is undoubtedly a fundamental point \u2013 and should be spearheaded by local governments. And in the case of Brazil, we are always concerned that we are often faced with a vast universe of intermediaries dealing with these resources, without them reaching the most needy populations, which clearly have a broad need for basic sanitation. Therefore, the governmental issue, which is no less notorious in Brazil, seems to be ineffective. Ultimately, the first thing that stops a Brazilian from believing that something will reach its destination is the government. But if you invent a figure exceeding 1 trillion dollars, there’s no doubt that there’s a whole class of intermediaries in the world willing to “mediate” these resources, and Brazil perhaps reaches the peak of this issue and this convergence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And why do I say this again? Because, as I said, before taking a step into the tropical forests, what we were led to consider, and to avoid deforestation, is that these forests would hold a wide variety of scientific solutions, taking into account that they are not only recipients of the fine paid by the carbon emitter in a quantity proportional to such resources, which, rather than a great joy, is a sign of non-compliance. And what is the issue? In colder regions of the planet, rising temperatures have led to the emergence of mosquitoes, for example. If the resources from carbon credits are not spent solely on education and basic sanitation by Brazilian local governments, in a traceable way, they should also, on behalf of the entire international and national community, invest in research on all species of fungi and bacteria existing there, in the inventory of all insects, in a clearly urgent way, which means that among the existing funds, sine qua non, these funds should be linked to the transfer to CNPq and Embrapa. And why is that? Because CNPq, for example, has quite extensive scientific funding in the country, which can and needs resources to combat tropical diseases, such as Dengue and Zika Virus, which congest the entire country’s health system, and are beginning to attack even the global northern funder with rising temperatures. Furthermore! When Embrapa finds better ways to utilize arable land and develops processes for seeds that can be used in conjunction with the forest and add value to its products, the agricultural frontier, which gains more yield per hectare in the same area of \u200b\u200bland, stops encroaching on the tropical forest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, Brazil’s main focus is the discourse that we must make money from keeping the forest standing. It even expresses concern about public sanitation issues, but this still seems like a poor perspective compared to what we could extract from what has prevented us from acting in the forest: finding scientific answers related to its biodiversity. And this, in my view, doesn’t involve attracting startups that identify an opportunity with a large amount of resources but don’t even generate patents for the country, let alone benefit someone at the end of the line. These are healthy doubts that haunt us in Brazil, even regarding government action. Therefore, the necessary link to Brazilian government agencies like CNPq, Embrapa, and even INPE’s meteorological research is crucial, because this is what guarantees a conservative return with a multiplier effect, which above all keeps the forest standing\u2014and has maintained it until now, only hypothetically, and not in the form of action demanded today. For example, when the forest produces medicine for all of humanity, and medicine patents for the country, when the forest improves land use, whether of the forest itself or of competing forests, it generates a certain financial gain for any investment fund, and not just the simplistic view we hear today in Brazil that it is necessary to remunerate a huge group of people, intermediaries and inhabitants of the tropical forest, simply for having the tree and cultivating it. Decipher it and find cures for tropical diseases that are beginning to afflict its funders due to rising temperatures, and register many patents in the country, which, in addition to being extremely profitable, are very expensive for public health systems, such as the Dengue patent for Brazil’s Unified Health System. And this should be done in a way that is linked to this purpose and with transparency and traceability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

P.S. The first ecologist I met wondered why that super bacteria, out of control in the forest, never climbs that other tree that’s been there seemingly unnoticed for decades. You know what that’s called? A trillion-dollar patent for a next-generation drug. <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PT-BR<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

COP30<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Murilo Jambeiro de Oliviera<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brasil, 6 de novembro de 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Confer\u00eancia do Clima na Amaz\u00f4nia brasileira, chamada de Confer\u00eancia da A\u00e7\u00e3o, tem um vi\u00e9s importante, hoje n\u00e3o \u00e9 uma felicidade profunda os recursos despendidos mundialmente, finalmente despendidos mundialmente no prop\u00f3sito do Protocolo de Kyoto, atendem na realidade o prop\u00f3sito de continuar emitindo carbono, tem eminentemente um papel punitivo que os tornam vastos recurso para continuar a emitir carbono na atmosfera atrav\u00e9s de um mecanismo punitivo adequado pois as consequ\u00eancias s\u00e3o globais. Qual \u00e9 a quest\u00e3o? Existem por exemplo no Brasil, imensos sumidouros, ou massas de absor\u00e7\u00e3o, de carbono. E a Amaz\u00f4nia brasileira tem um grande desafio, como todo o pa\u00eds, fazer se tornar vantagem economicamente manter a floresta em p\u00e9, cumprindo esse papel de massas de absor\u00e7\u00e3o de carbono, como mais digno e mais potencialmente rico atrav\u00e9s desses mecanismos punitivos que surgem com o Protocolo de Kyoto, afirme-se mais uma vez, no computo global n\u00e3o \u00e9 o atendimento a uma solu\u00e7\u00e3o, mas uma provid\u00eancia de mitiga\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mas vamos aos fatos, \u00e9 um problema de saneamento b\u00e1sico em todos os aspectos que isso compreende no Brasil, n\u00e3o \u00e9 simplesmente zelar para um “Produtor de \u00c1gua” invista em matas ciliares, h\u00e1 uma necessidade de concatena\u00e7\u00e3o governamental na distribui\u00e7\u00e3o de tais recursos, onde que mais se escuta na Brasil e nos \u00e9 bastante eloquente, que \u00e9 preciso fazer valer a pena manter a floresta de p\u00e9. E isso \u00e9, gerar atividade econ\u00f4mica, fluxo financeiro, para um determinada popula\u00e7\u00e3o, que simplesmente exclui o desmatamento e transfere os ciclos econ\u00f4micos para os povos para floresta, para aqueles que minimamente n\u00e3o a sejam agressivos, a floresta em p\u00e9. E n\u00e3o deve se limitar a isso.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Durante muitos anos um dos grandes discursos carentes de a\u00e7\u00e3o quando a floresta tropical foi n\u00e3o se sabe e n\u00e3o se compreende sua biodiversidade. Antes de ser um definidor de a\u00e7\u00e3o urgente, foi um fator de conten\u00e7\u00e3o ideol\u00f3gica quando ao que a floresta em p\u00e9, n\u00e3o precisa simplesmente ser rent\u00e1vel para quem ali vive, esse \u00e9 sem sombra de d\u00favida um ponto fundamental, deve ser capitaneado por governos locais, e em se tratando de Brasil sempre nos gera a preocupa\u00e7\u00e3o central de muitas vezes estarmos n\u00f3s diante de um enorme universo de atravessadores desses recursos, sem que isso chegue na ponta de popula\u00e7\u00f5es mais necessidades, que s\u00e3o claramente as necessidades de saneamento b\u00e1sico de forma ampla, por isso a quest\u00e3o governamental, que n\u00e3o \u00e9 menos c\u00e9lebre no Brasil, que em sendo governo parece n\u00e3o chegar, no limite a primeira coisa que det\u00e9m um brasileiro no sentido de acredita que algo chegue ao seu destino, \u00e9 o governo, mas se voc\u00ea inventar uma cifra que ultrapassa 1 trilh\u00e3o de d\u00f3lares, n\u00e3o h\u00e1 duvida que existem todo uma classe de passageiros no mundo disposta a “intermediar” esses recursos, e o Brasil talvez atinja o auge dessa quest\u00e3o e dessa reuni\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

E por que digo isso novamente? Porque como disse, antes de dar um passo nas florestas tropicais, o que fomos levamos a pensar e evitar o desmate, \u00e9 que ali se reservariam solu\u00e7\u00f5es para ci\u00eancia as mais variadas, levando em considera\u00e7\u00e3o que eles n\u00e3o s\u00f3 as destinat\u00e1rias da multa paga pelo emissor de carbono em quantidade proporcional a tais recursos, que antes de uma grande felicidade, \u00e9 um cifra da n\u00e3o-conformidade. E qual \u00e9 a quest\u00e3o? Em regi\u00f5es frias do planeta, o aumento de temperaturas fez surgir mosquitos por exemplo. Se o recurso advindo dos cr\u00e9ditos de carbono, n\u00e3o \u00e9 gasto apenas como educa\u00e7\u00e3o e saneamento b\u00e1sico pelos governos locais brasileiros, de forma rastre\u00e1vel, deve tamb\u00e9m, em nome de toda a coletividade internacional e nacional, investir em pesquisas, de todas as esp\u00e9cies de fungos e bact\u00e9rias ali existentes, na inventaria\u00e7\u00e3o de todos os insetos, de forma clara urgente em pesquisa, o que quer dizer que dentre os fundos existentes, sini qua non, esses fundos deveriam ser vinculados ao repasse ao CNPq e a Embrapa. E por que isso? Porque o CNPq por exemplo, tem um financiamento cientifico bastante amplo no pa\u00eds, que pode e precisa, de recursos contra doen\u00e7as tropicais, como a Dengue, e o Zika V\u00edrus, que congestionam todo o sistema de sa\u00fade do pa\u00eds, e come\u00e7a a atacar com alta das temperaturas at\u00e9 mesmo o pr\u00f3prio financiador do norte global. Para al\u00e9m! Quando a Embrapa encontra melhor aproveitamento de terras agricultur\u00e1veis e desenvolve processos para sementes que podem ser utilizadas de forma consorciada a floresta e agregar valor em seus produtos, a fronteira agr\u00edcola que ganhar no mesmo espa\u00e7o de terra mais safra por hectare, deixa de avan\u00e7ar sobre a floresta tropical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ou seja, o Brasil tem como carro chefe o discurso, temos que ganhar dinheiro com a floresta em p\u00e9, tem at\u00e9 mesmo como preocupa\u00e7\u00e3o quest\u00f5es de saneamento p\u00fablico, mas ainda nos parece um perspectiva pobre, diante daquela que podemos extrair do que muito nos deteve a agir na floresta, encontrar respostas cientificas com sua biodiversidade. E isso, no meu ponto de vista n\u00e3o passa pela capta\u00e7\u00e3o de startup que identifica uma oportunidade num montante tamanho de recursos, mas n\u00e3o reverte nem mesmo patentes para pa\u00eds, quando reverte alguma coisa para algu\u00e9m na ponta da linha, duvidas salutares que nos assombram no Brasil at\u00e9 mesmo em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a a\u00e7\u00e3o governamental, e por isso, a necess\u00e1ria vincula\u00e7\u00e3o a \u00f3rg\u00e3o do governo brasileiro como CNPq, e ou Embrapa, e at\u00e9 mesmo as pesquisas meteorol\u00f3gicas do INPE, porque isso sim \u00e9 garantia de retorno conservador com efeito multiplicador, que sobretudo mant\u00e9m a floresta em p\u00e9, manteve at\u00e9 inclusive apenas e t\u00e3o somente sob hip\u00f3tese, e n\u00e3o na forma de a\u00e7\u00e3o como se pede hoje. Afim, por exemplo, quando a floresta produz rem\u00e9dio para toda humanidade, e patente de rem\u00e9dio para o pa\u00eds, quando o floresta melhora o aproveitamento da terra, seja da pr\u00f3pria floresta, ou da que concorre com ela, ela gera um ganho financeiro certo para qualquer fundo de investimento, e n\u00e3o apenas e t\u00e3o somente o simplismos que ouvimos hoje em dia no Brasil, de que \u00e9 preciso remunerar com dinheiro na m\u00e3o um imenso grupo de pessoas, atravessadores e moradores da floresta tropical, pelo simples fato de ter e arvore e cultua-la. Decifre-a e encontre a cura para doen\u00e7as tropicais que come\u00e7am a afligir seus financiadores do o aumento de temperatura, e registre no pa\u00eds, patentes muitas, que al\u00e9m de extremamente rent\u00e1veis, s\u00e3o car\u00edssimas para os sistemas de sa\u00fade p\u00fablica, como a da Dengue para o Sistema \u00danico de Sa\u00fade do Brasil. E isso seja feito de forma vinculada a esse fim e com transpar\u00eancia e rastrabilidade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

P.S. O primeiro ecologista que eu conheci, se perguntou porque aquela super bact\u00e9ria em descontrole na floresta, nunca sobe aquela outra arvore que est\u00e1 ali como quem n\u00e3o quer nada h\u00e1 d\u00e9cadas. Sabe qual o nome disso, patente trilhon\u00e1ria de f\u00e1rmaco de ultima gera\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

@CoexistenceLaw<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Murilo Jambeiro de Oliveira Brazil, November 6, 2026. The Climate Conference in the Brazilian Amazon, called the Action Conference, has an important bias. Currently, the resources spent globally on the Kyoto Protocol are not a source of great happiness; they actually serve the purpose of continuing carbon emissions. They have an eminently punitive role, making<\/p>\n

Ler mais<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,3],"tags":[747,17,18,742,745,187,746,527,743,167,744,749,748,73],"class_list":["post-2127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-unga2021","category-preaching","tag-biodiversity","tag-brasil","tag-brazil","tag-carbon-credits","tag-cnpq","tag-cop30","tag-embrapa","tag-inpe","tag-kyoto-protocol","tag-onu","tag-paris-agreement","tag-patents","tag-research","tag-un"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2127"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2135,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127\/revisions\/2135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}