{"id":1861,"date":"2025-06-12T20:02:27","date_gmt":"2025-06-12T23:02:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/?p=1861"},"modified":"2025-06-12T20:21:40","modified_gmt":"2025-06-12T23:21:40","slug":"the-student-of-tiananmen-square","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/?p=1861","title":{"rendered":"The Student of Tiananmen Square"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Murilo Jambeiro de Oliveira<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Brasil, 12 de junho de 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I am grateful for the coverage by AP, AFP, and EFE, as well as Reuters. As was reported yesterday on Rede Globo, the prerogatives of the Brazilian Bar Association continue to be a privilege of the Workers&#8217; Party, and yet they consider not offering a defense to a lawyer using the tricks of a false public defender and promising economic advantages to parents and siblings, having their Brazilian citizenship and the right to vote taken away according to the Parquet, where they still intend to bring my trial.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O Estudante da Pra\u00e7a da Paz Celestial<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Agrade\u00e7o a cobertura da AP, AFP, e da EFE, al\u00e9m da Reuters. Como se soube ontem na Rede Globo as prerrogativas da Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil segue sendo privil\u00e9gio do Partido dos Trabalhadores e mesmo assim se considera n\u00e3o oferecer defesa a um advogado utilizando de artimanhas de falsa defesora p\u00fablica e prometendo vantagem economica pra os pais e irm\u00e3os, tendo subtraida a cidadania p\u00e1tria brasileira como o direito a voto segundo Parquet, onde se pretende ainda meu julgamento.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>@CoexistenceLaw  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Murilo Jambeiro de Oliveira Brasil, 12 de junho de 2025. I am grateful for the coverage by AP, AFP, and EFE, as well as Reuters. As was reported yesterday on Rede Globo, the prerogatives of the Brazilian Bar Association continue to be a privilege of the Workers&#8217; Party, and yet they consider not offering a<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/?p=1861\" class=\"more-link\">Ler mais<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[599,358,601,602],"class_list":["post-1861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-unga2021","tag-afp","tag-associated-press","tag-efe","tag-reuters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1861"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1861"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1863,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1861\/revisions\/1863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coexistencelaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}