<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Murilo Jambeiro de Oliveira<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Brazil, January 24, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bitcoin was developed by the NSA, there is a supposed fragility, and the quantity is still very limited in this Bitcoin standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I talked a little about some standard that respects a commodity backing and is not the backing itself, or traded like a stock, I have questions, legends and issues, the accumulation of such a quantity generates fragility, and there is no quantity of Bitcoin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
My question: An interbank standard with commodity backing, for interbank transactions, something like thinking about the Swift system, a standard for transactions in this type of widely accepted messaging system, with a score in Chicago. Same approximate question, there are many chains to be adopted around the world, but some have to answer for Swift, so to speak, and I think it is insufficient and the legendary security flaw of obtaining half is widely described.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And then the interesting news about Trump’s regulation also becomes a legend, whether it goes up or down because of that, they never proved the legend, but it is mathematically possible. From what I see here, it can go up to 92, which is also a regulation, but whoever says it goes up to 109, the buyer seems to be them. I think the issue is not resolved, but we have Willow-type chips today, as an example of what I have read. The hypothesis of 50% +1 not existing is not the current case, and it seems to me more like regulation than anything else, because it is resolved that it does not reach this amount that can be mined. Although it is not just Bitcoin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In my reasoning on the subject, there are about three posts here on the Blog, about what I call Water, that is why the Water standard is necessary (a huge emission), and not necessarily, as he already points out in the decree, Trump, to be a Digital Dollar, I mean, it is not a transaction in the market, in my criteria of things, like you don’t pay the bakery with T10. I have been advocating for a standard that can generate as much currency as Water, and that is Treasury 10 paper. It is how currency is printed, not legal tender. Let’s see what is intended in the United States now with David Sacks (Pay-Pal).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is confusing, like everything else in this universe, but I bet on the fall in the value of Bitcoin because there is regulation (that is the news of the day), and on top of that, I believe that it has to be backed by commodities, and be suitable for something like a treasury bond. It is not a popular subject, it is confusing until the week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Imagine that you have the cloud, and the rise and fall of the cloud, you go up with the currency you want and from it with the currency you want, that has been my point for a decade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It reminds me of Swift, which is no longer used in Russia due to an embargo, and is completely replaced by some blockchain, with a basket of commodities, for example. I have an absurd criterion, but let’s keep it simple in the example: it’s 1% iron, 0.5% copper, 0.2% lithium, 2% beef, and whatever else you can imagine of commodities, a basket more or less like this, my ideal basket has to do with – aggregated or spent WATER – represented IN PARTS OF THINGS in relation to the whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You have the Water Score in Chicago, and the Water Close when you transact. The curse is in the basket account and in the standard. You have to arbitrate the Water Score, and have enough quantity and liquidity for all the Water Closes of all the currencies of all the standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Brasil, 24 de janeiro de 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
O Bitcoin foi a NSA que desenvolveu, h\u00e1 uma suposta fragilidade, e a quantidade ainda \u00e9 muito limitada nesse padr\u00e3o Bitcoin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Falei um pouco sobre algum padr\u00e3o que respeite um lastro commoditie e n\u00e3o seja o lastro em si, ou negociado como uma a\u00e7\u00e3o, tenho quest\u00f5es, lendas e quest\u00f5es, o acumulo de quantidade tal gera fragilidade, e n\u00e3o h\u00e1 quantidade de Bitcoin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A minha quest\u00e3o: Um padr\u00e3o interbanc\u00e1rio com lastro commodities, para transa\u00e7\u00f5es interbanc\u00e1rias, algo como pensar no sistema Swift, um padr\u00e3o para transa\u00e7\u00e3o nesse tipo de sistema mensageiro amplamente aceito, com um score em Chicago. Mesma quest\u00e3o aproximada at\u00e9, h\u00e1 muitas correntes para serem adotadas em todo o mundo, mas alguma tem que responder pelo Swift por assim dizer, e eu acho ela insuficiente e a falha lend\u00e1ria de seguran\u00e7a de obten\u00e7\u00e3o de metade \u00e9 amplamente descrita.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
E dai que o que interessa da not\u00edcia da regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o por Trump tamb\u00e9m vira lenda, se sobe ou se cai por isso, nunca provaram a lenda, mas ela \u00e9 matematicamente poss\u00edvel. Pelo que vejo aqui pode ceder at\u00e9 92, regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o que \u00e9 tamb\u00e9m, mas a quem diga que bate em 109, comprador que os parece. Tenho para mim que resolvida n\u00e3o est\u00e1 a quest\u00e3o, mas temos por exemplo chips tipo Willow hoje, a titulo de exemplo do que tenho lido. A hip\u00f3tese do 50% +1 n\u00e3o exista n\u00e3o \u00e9 o caso atual, e me parece regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o mais do qualquer coisa, pelo resolvido que n\u00e3o fica nessa quantidade poss\u00edvel de minerar. Embora n\u00e3o seja s\u00f3 Bitcoin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No meu arrazoado sobre o tema, tem umas tr\u00eas postagens aqui no Blog, do que chamo de Water, por isso, porque \u00e9 necess\u00e1rio o padr\u00e3o Water (uma emiss\u00e3o imensa), e n\u00e3o necessariamente, como ele j\u00e1 aponta no decreto, Trump, para ser um D\u00f3lar Digital, digo, n\u00e3o \u00e9 de transa\u00e7\u00e3o na pra\u00e7a, no meu crit\u00e9rio de coisas, como voc\u00ea n\u00e3o paga a padaria com T10. Tenho defendido um padr\u00e3o que possa gerar tanta moeda, como Water, e que seja papel tipo Treasure 10. \u00c9 como se imprime moeda, e n\u00e3o moeda corrente. Vamos ver o que se pretende nos Estados Unidos agora com David Sacks (Pay-Pal).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00c9 at\u00e9 confuso como tudo nesse universo, mas eu aposto na queda no valor do Bitcoin por haver regulamenta\u00e7\u00e3o (\u00e9 essa a not\u00edcia do dia), e al\u00e9m de tudo, acredito que tem que ter um lastro em commodities, e se prestar a algo como titulo do tesouro. N\u00e3o \u00e9 assunto popular, \u00e9 confuso at\u00e9 a semana.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Imagine que voc\u00ea tem a nuvem, e o sobe-desce da nuvem, voc\u00ea sobe com a moeda que quiser e desde com a moeda que quiser, \u00e9 esse meu ponto h\u00e1 j\u00e1 vai d\u00e9cada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Me lembra o Swift, que j\u00e1 t\u00e1 sem uso na R\u00fassia por embargo, e seja inteiramente substitu\u00eddo por algum blockchain, com uma cesta de commodities, por exemplo, eu tenho um crit\u00e9rio absurdo, mas vamos ser simples no exemplo: \u00e9 1% de ferro, 0,5% de cobre, 0,2% de Lithium, 2% de boi gordo, e o que mais voc\u00ea imaginar de commoditie, uma cesta mais ou menos assim, a minha cesta ideal tem a ver com – \u00c1GUA agregada ou dispendida – representada EM PARTES DE COISA em rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao todo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Voc\u00ea tem o Water Score em Chicago, e o Water Close quando vc transaciona. A maldi\u00e7\u00e3o t\u00e1 na conta da cesta e no padr\u00e3o. Voc\u00ea tem que arbitrar o Water Score, e ter um quantidade e liquidez suficiente para todos os Water Close de todas as moedas de todos os padr\u00f5es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
@CoexistenceLaw <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Murilo Jambeiro de Oliveira Brazil, January 24, 2025. Bitcoin was developed by the NSA, there is a supposed fragility, and the quantity is still very limited in this Bitcoin standard. I talked a little about some standard that respects a commodity backing and is not the backing itself, or traded like a stock, I have<\/p>\n